Hi Nicola. I have been a live in Warden twice and consider it part of my duties to be on call ‘out of hours’, which is why I have a flat provided. My onsite flat is my home. I certainly do not expect to be paid extra for being on call if I am on site – surely this is implicit in the type of role a Warden undertakes and low cost/free accommodation is provided to facilitate this. If the Warden is not expected to be on call, then surely there is no need to provide a flat.
Both sites I’ve worked at have had telecare systems for emergencies. However, a live-in Warden is there to provide reassurance and assistance in both property and people emergencies. As mentioned in a previous post, I’d hate for a resident to have called an ambulance and be sat on their own, in distress, until family/paramedics arrive. Also, at my current post the Almshouses are Grade I listed properties in a rural location and an on site presence in a property emergency, such as a fire, could be invaluable.
In my last post, when I left, the Warden position became a live-out role and the Warden’s flat became an income generating property. There does seem to be a move away from live-in Warden posts.
However, all of this is being said without knowing what the Warden’s contract states, if your Warden has another home to go at weekends/if the flat was not provided and whether their property is provided on site as an ‘essential requirement of the job’ based on them being an on-call for their job out of normal working hours (tax implications can be complicated around this).
Sam