JosephineW

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Safeguarding assessment of resident #178293
    Jo Williamson College Of Matrons
    Clerk/CEO

    HI Lynn I think it depends on the type of safeguarding incident (no need to disclose here obviously!) and I would be wary of answering before I knew more. Another thing I would be wary of in your shoes is “going it alone” as in the trustee/charity deciding unilaterally whether and what kind of risk assessment to carry out. It could be that its a perfectly legitimate thing to do or it could be “boundary creep” and straying in to territory which can be a legal minefield should things take that turn. I would give The Association a ring for more specific advice if I were you . We have indeed had safeguarding concerns with residents in the past but any risk assessment was done under the guidance/input of professionals.

    in reply to: Heating Network Regulations #175787
    Jo Williamson College Of Matrons
    Clerk/CEO

    you’re welcome – it does look a bit much 🙂 but I saw your enquiry EXACTLY when I was doing something on this for our files!

    in reply to: Heating Network Regulations #175471
    Jo Williamson College Of Matrons
    Clerk/CEO

    Hi! You’re not alone – the wording is heavy and it does feel like it’s starting before there’s an easy/clear/practical pathway. We’re working through this too. Here’s our take:
    Are we a “supplier” or “operator” (or both)?
    Most almshouse charities with communal/district heating will effectively be both in practice:
    Operator = the organisation responsible for running/maintaining the communal heating system day-to-day (even if you use contractors for servicing/repairs)
    Supplier = the organisation that is effectively supplying heat/hot water to residents and recovering the cost (via service charge/WMC/etc)
    So if your charity provides communal heat/hot water to residents via a central boiler/plant and recovers the costs, you’re likely in scope.
    Is registration a legal requirement?
    Yes – if you’re in scope, registration is required, but the timetable is in stages:
    Consumer protection rules start 27 January 2026 (clear information, fair charging approach, complaints route etc)
    Registration deadline is 26 January 2027 (via Ofgem’s Heat Networks Digital Service)

    So you haven’t missed the registration deadline yet. My understanding is the digital service is due to go live in Spring 2026, so you may not be able to register immediately, but you can prepare now to show compliance with the Jan 27th deadline.

    What do we need to do now to prepare (practically)?
    For most small charities, sensible prep could be (and this is what we’re doing):

    Write a short description of your system (communal boilers serving X homes; heating + hot water)

    Be able to explain how residents are charged (shared-cost basis / WMC / service charge, especially if not individually heat-metered)

    Put in place a basic queries/complaints route and keep simple records (e.g. outages/major repairs and what you communicated)

    Gather the key info you’ll need for registration (site(s), number of dwellings served, who is responsible)

    Helpful extra step (especially for 27 Jan): draft a short resident note (even 1 page) that says something like “We provide communal heating/hot water via a central boiler. It isn’t individually heat-metered, so costs are recovered through the WMC/service charge on a shared-cost basis. Here’s who to contact if you have a question or a problem.” You don’t necessarily need to issue this to residents as an announcement, but it’s useful to have ready so you can share promptly and consistently if anyone queries the charges, and it can be folded into your welcome pack/handbook going forward.

    We’ve also set up a simple “heat network compliance” file so we can evidence the consumer protection basics (system description, charging approach, complaints route, key records) and be ready for Ofgem registration when the digital service opens. It’s more about being able to demonstrate a clear, proportionate approach if asked, rather than creating lots of extra admin.

    If the system isn’t individually heat-metered, a clear and consistent shared-cost approach is usually the most proportionate (and the least likely to cause admin chaos); as long as it’s transparent and documented that should be fine.

    Ofgem’s heat network hub/timeline pages are helpful for dates and “what happens when”. This is Ofgem’s registration guidance page:
    https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/consultation/heat-networks-regulation-registration-guidance

    Hope that helps – happy to compare notes if useful as we’re going through the same process.

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)